Pennsylvania Court Delivers an Election Integrity Win—5 Years Too Late
Court orders Pennsylvania to publicly disclose Cast Vote Records from ‘most secure election in U.S. history’
After Pennsylvania taxpayers funded a lengthy legal battle in which the state fought to prevent taxpayers from seeing election integrity records, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a unanimous April 28 opinion, has sided with taxpayers.
The case started with a 2021 Right to Know request by open-source investigator and election analyst Heather Honey. She asked Lycoming County for a digital copy of the Cast Vote Record (CVR) file for every precinct tabulator and central tabulator used in the 2020 General Election.
Notably, in August 2025, President Donald Trump appointed Honey to serve as the Department of Homeland Security's deputy assistant secretary for elections integrity. Her expertise prompted bitter attacks from leftists aiming to discredit her, but they can't argue with the facts in the election records she has made accessible to everyone in Pennsylvania, all because she refused to back down.
Because of the court's decision, going forward, anyone can request CVRs in Pennsylvania and use it for election integrity research.
Five-Year Battle
The county rejected Honey’s 2021 Right to Know request, arguing that the CVR contained the “contents of ballot boxes and voting machines,” which are not public records according to the state election code, written in 1937, long before electronic voting.
Honey argued that the CVR is public information. It's a spreadsheet of raw data. It does not resemble a ballot or contain identifiable voter information, nor is it housed inside a voting box or machine. Instead, the CVR is just what the name says: a record of every cast vote, generated as optical scanners read the results. It can be used to verify voting totals.
The Right to Know request escalated to court. Two Lycoming County voters joined the court case. The Pennsylvania Department of State (PADOS) has spent years in court trying to prevent the release of these records. And that is strange because, despite the counterintuitive results of the 2020 election, and the gut feelings of millions of voters begging for someone competent to double-check the results, the word was that the 2020 presidential election was the “most secure in U.S. history.”
Former Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency Director Chris Krebs: "The 2020 election was the most secure in U.S. history...while elections are sometimes messy, this was a secure election. Of that I have no doubt."
— CSPAN (@cspan) December 16, 2020
Full Senate hearing video: https://t.co/2RpqO2s58g pic.twitter.com/7hzf1jGzE0
Safe and secure. It was said again and again.
We just had an election, an election that was secure, an election where the votes were tallied. A proper winner will be certified, based not on the words of President Trump, but the votes of the American people. https://t.co/HM870JeVf6
— Josh Shapiro (@JoshShapiroPA) November 9, 2020
And again.
Republicans say we need transparency.
— Josh Shapiro (@JoshShapiroPA) June 10, 2021
You know what transparency would be? Not lying to your constituents — and not denying the simple fact that the 2020 election was safe, secure, and fair.
We need the truth. Nothing less. pic.twitter.com/v4PJTt4m3c
And again.
Thank you @ucberkeley for hosting this important conversation about our efforts ensure safe and secure elections in 2020.
— Josh Shapiro (@JoshShapiroPA) March 12, 2021
Leaders across this country, myself included, will continue to protect the right to vote and fight any future election disinformation efforts. pic.twitter.com/gjFBgmjd75
And again.
When Donald Trump and his allies tried to throw out legal, eligible votes in Pennsylvania, we went to court 43 times — and we went 43-0.
— Josh Shapiro (@JoshShapiroPA) February 17, 2026
We had a safe and secure election then in 2020 — and we will in 2026. pic.twitter.com/r6H6wMIWHR
The 2020 results were so “secure” in Pennsylvania that the PADOS kept going back to court to prevent the release of the CVR records that could help prove its claim.
Trust, But Verify
Justice Daniel D. McCaffery, a Democrat, opened his opinion with a quote from John Adams, writing, “Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right . . . and a desire to know.”
Continuing in his own words, McCaffery wrote:
The foundation of a democratic society rests on the knowledge that the results of our elections are accurate and trustworthy, otherwise the legitimacy of our government is put at risk. Roughly two centuries after John Adams, Ronald Reagan advised us to ‘trust, but verify.’ Originally uttered in the context of 1980s’ arms control and foreign policy, that sage advice is apropos to our electoral process and the matter with which our Court is confronted here. This case is about how to satisfy the voting public that our elections are safe, secure, and accurate. And, at the same time, it is about how we preserve the guarantee of our State Constitution that a vote, once cast, will remain secret.
The 34-page opinion concludes that the CVR is a public document. The record’s disclosure allows the public to “check the math” of Voter Services, “facilitates greater trust in our elections, boosts confidence in electoral integrity and protects and promotes the legitimacy of our election outcomes,” McCaffery wrote. He added that the randomized vote record’s release would not violate voter secrecy laws “any more than a tally of votes.”
Restoration News asked PADOS if it will accept the decision or seek a reversal from the U.S. Supreme Court. The public servants did not respond.
Hollow Victory
It’s always a little weird when a government uses public tax funds to take the public to court. It smacks of the government protecting itself. The taxpayers end up paying legal fees for both sides. The decision proves the public was always entitled to the information.
The research based on the 2020 CVR records should have been completed before the 2021 inauguration. Independent researchers will only get their hands on those records now, nearly six years after the fact, far too late to affect the 2020 election.
But because of this decision, no one in Pennsylvania should have a problem obtaining CVR records to independently check the results of future elections.
MORE AMERICA FIRST NEWS:
Election Integrity: Secure Elections? Feds, Watchdog Found Over 6 Million Illicit Votes on US Rolls
Virginia: Meet the Soros-Funded Prosecutor Taking Soft-on-Crime to a New Level
Exclusive: The Legal Machine Behind Oregon’s Open Borders Rebellion—And Why Your State Should Pay Attention
Watch: The Post-Green Future Is Coming Fast, with Kevin Mooney | Restoration Spotlight
We need your help to save America—chip in today.
Restoration News, a project of Restoration of America, is your trusted investigative news source for the America First movement. As a rapidly growing conservative news site, we focus on delivering accurate and insightful exposés on political news, immigration news, leftist lies, and other pressing issues affecting everyday Americans. Our uncompromising commitment to a hard-hitting, fact-based, America First, and faithful perspective ensures that you receive news that aligns with your values.
Every dollar gets us closer to winning the war on woke.